Most of what follows is taken from ​Krumholz et al. 2007

Physics of Radiation Transfer

tau = l \kappa=\frac{l}{\lambda_p	beta = \frac{u}{c
tau << 1	streaming limit
tau >> 1 \mbox{, } \beta \tau <<	static diffusion limit
tau >> 1 \mbox{, } \beta \tau >>	dynamic diffusion limit

Equations of Radiation Hydrodynamics

Equations of Radiation Hydrodynamics

frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \left ( \rho \mathbf{v} \right ) =

frac{\partial }{\partial t} \left ( \rho \mathbf{v} \right ) + \nabla \cdot \left ( \rho \mathbf{vv} \right ) = -\nabla P+\mathbf{G

frac{\partial e}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \left [ \left ( e + P \right ) \mathbf{v} \right ] = c G^

frac{\partial E}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = -c G_0

frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \mathbf{F}}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \mathbf{P} = -\mathbf{G

where the moments of the specific intensity are defined as

E=\int_0^\infty d \nu \int d \Omega I(\mathbf{n}, \nu

mathbf{F}=\int_0^\infty d \nu \int d \Omega \mathbf{n} I(\mathbf{n}, \nu

\mathbf{P}=\int_0^\infty d \nu \int d \Omega \mathbf{nn} I(\mathbf{n}, \nu

and the radiation 4-momentum is given by

G^0 = \int_0^\infty d \nu \int d \Omega \left [ \kappa (\mathbf{n}, v)I(\mathbf{n}, \nu)-\eta(\mathbf{n},v) \right

\mathbf{G} = \int_0^\infty d \nu \int d \Omega \left [ \kappa (\mathbf{n}, v)I(\mathbf{n}, \nu)-\eta(\mathbf{n},v) \right ] \mathbf{n

If we had a closure relation for the radiation pressure then we could solve this system. For gas particles, collisions tend to produce a Boltzmann Distribution which is isotropic and gives a pressure tensor that is a multiple of the identity tensor. Photons do not "collide" with each other and they all have the same velocity 'c' but in various directions. If the field were isotropic than ^{ij}=\delta^{ij} 1/3 but in general ^{ij}=f^{ij} where 'f' is the Eddington Tensor.

Simplifiying assumptions

Simplifying assumptions

• If the flux spectrum of the radiation is direction-independent then we can write the radiation four-force density in terms of the moments of the radiation field

^0=\gamma [ \gamma^2 \kappa_{0E} + (1-\gamma^2)\kappa_{0F}]E-\gamma \kappa_{0P}a_RT_0^4-\gamma(\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{F}/c^2)[\kappa_{0F}-2\gamma^2(\kappa_{0F}-\kappa_{0E})] - \gamma^3(\kappa_{0F}-\kappa+{0E})(\mathbf{vv}) : \mathbf{P}/c^

mathbf{G} = \gamma \kappa_{0F}(\mathbf{F}/c)-\gamma \kappa_{0P}a_RT_0^4 (\mathbf{v}/c) - \left [ \gamma^3( \kappa_{0F} - \kappa_{0E})( \mathbf{v}/c)E + \gamma \kappa_{0F}(\mathbf{v}/c) \cdot \mathbf{P} \right ] + \gamma^3 ( \kappa_{0F} - \kappa_{0E}) \left [ 2 \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{F}/c^3 - ( \mathbf{vv}) : \mathbf{P}/c^3 \right ] \mathbf{v}

where

kappa_{0P	comoving-frame Planck function weighted opacity
kappa_{0E	comoving-frame radiation energy weighted opacity
kappa_{0F	comoving-frame radiation flux weighted opacity

• If the radiation has a blackbody spectrum then kappa_{0E}=\kappa_{0P
• If the radiation is optically thick, then

mathbf{F_0}(\nu_0) \propto -\nabla E_0(\nu_0)/\kappa_0(\nu_0) \propto -[\partial B(\nu_0, T_0) / \partial T_0](\nabla T_0)/\kappa_0(\nu_0

which implies that kappa_{0F}^{-1}=\kappa_{0R}^{-1}=\frac{\int_0^\infty d \nu_0 \kappa_0(\nu_0)^{-1}[\partial B(\nu_0,T_0)/\partial T_0]}{\int_0^\infty d \nu_0 [\partial B(\nu_0, T_0)/\partial T_0]

• In the optically thin regime, \mathbf{F}_0(\nu_0)| \rightarrow cE_0(\nu_0 so we would have kappa_{0F}=\kappa_{0E however assuming a blackbody temperature in the optically thin limit may be any more accurate than assuming that kappa_{0F}=\kappa_{0R

Flux limited diffusion

Flux limited diffusion

The flux limited diffusion approximation drops the radiation momentum equation in favor of mathbf{F}_0=-\frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}}\nabla E_

where lambd is the flux-limiter

lambda = \frac{1}{R} \left ( \coth R - \frac{1}{R} \right ) =\frac{|\nabla E_0|}{\kappa_{0R}E_0

which corresponds to a pressure tensor

mathbf{P}_0=\frac{E_0}{2}[(1-R_2)\mathbf{I}+(3R_2-1)\mathbf{n}_0\mathbf{n}_0 _2=\lambda+\lambda^2R^

If we Lorentz boost the comoving terms into the lab frame and keep terms necessary to maintain accuracy we get:

^0=\kappa_{0P} \left ( E-\frac{4 \pi B}{c} \right ) + \left ( \frac{\lambda}{c} \right ) \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}} - 1 \right ) \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E - \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{c^2} E \left [ \frac{3-R_2}{2}v^2 + \frac{3R_2-1}{2}(\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 \right ] + \frac{1}{2} \left ( \frac{v}{c} \right ) ^2 \kappa_{0P} \left ( E - \frac{4 \pi B}{c} \right ) mathbf{G} = -\lambda \nabla E + \kappa_{0P} \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c} \left ( E - \frac{4 \pi B}{c} \right ) - \frac{1}{2} \left ( \frac{v}{c} \right ) ^2 \lambda \nabla E + 2 \lambda \left ( \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}} - 1 \right ) \frac{(\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E )\mathbf{v}}{c^2

Numerics of Flux Limited Diffusion

If we plug the expressions for the radiation 4-momentum back into the gas equations and keep terms necessary to maintain accuracy we get:

frac{\partial }{\partial t} \left ( \rho \mathbf{v} \right ) + \nabla \cdot \left ( \rho \mathbf{vv} \right ) = -\nabla P\color{green}{-\lambda \nabla E frac{\partial e}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \left [ \left ( e + P \right ) \mathbf{v} \right ] = \color{red}{-\kappa_{0P}(4 \pi B-cE)} \color{green}{+\lambda \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right ) \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E} \color{blue}{-\frac{3-R_2}{2}\kappa_{0P}\frac{v^2}{c}E frac{\partial E}{\partial t} \color{red}{ - \nabla \cdot \frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E} = \color{red}{\kappa_{0P} (4 \pi B-cE)} \color{green}{-\lambda \left(2\frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right )\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla E} \color{green}{-\nabla \cdot \left ( \frac{3-R_2}{2}\mathbf{v}E \right )} \color{blue}{+\frac{3-R_2}{2}\kappa_{0P}\frac{v^2}{c}E}

For static diffusion, the terms in blue with v²/c can be dropped and the system can be split into the usual hydro update (black), radiative source terms (green), and a coupled implicit solve (red) for the radiation energy density and thermal energy density (ie temperature).

Operator Splitting 1

Operator splitting

Krumholz et al. perform Implicit Radiative, Explicit Hydro, Explicit Radiative

In AstroBEAR this would look like:

• Initialization
  • Prolongate, d, p, e, E, Edot
• Step 1
  • Overlap d, p, e, E and do physical BC's
  • Do IR which updates e₀, and E₀ using d₁, e₁, E₁
  • Update E_2*mbc using Edot_2*mbc
  • Update e_2*mbc using E_2*mbc, Edot_2*mbc, and e_2*mbc
  • Update Edot₀ using pre IR and post IR E₀
  • Ghost e_2*mbc, E_mbc+1, Edot_mbc+1
  • Do first EH_mbc
  • Do ER_mbc —- Terms with grad E can be done without ghosting since EH did not change E. The del dot vE term needs time centered face centered velocities which can be stored during the hydro update.
  • Store Edot in child arrays to be prolongated
• Step 2
  • Overlap d, p, e, E, and do physical BCs
  • Do IR which updates e₀, and E₀ using d₁, e₁, E₁
  • Update Edot₀ using pre IR and post IR E₀
  • Update E₁ using Edot₁
  • Ghost e_mbc, E₁, Edot₁
  • Do second EH₀
  • Do ER₀ —- Terms with grad E can be done without ghosting since EH did not change E. The del dot vE term needs time centered face centered velocities which can be stored during the hydro update.

Explcit Update 1

Eplicit Update 1

The extra terms in the explicit update due to radiation energy are as follows:

frac{\partial }{\partial t} \left ( \rho \mathbf{v} \right ) =-\lambda \nabla frac{\partial e}{\partial t} = \lambda \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right ) \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = -\lambda \left(2\frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right )\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla E -\nabla \cdot \left ( \frac{3-R_2}{2}\mathbf{v}E \right )

These can be discretized as follows:

^{n+1}_i=p^n_i - \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} \lambda_{i} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right )

^{n+1}_i=e^n_i + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} \lambda_i \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa^n_{i,0P}}{\kappa^n_{i,0R}}-1 \right ) \left ( v^n_i \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right ) \right )

^{n+1}_i=E^n_i - \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} \left ( \frac{\lambda_i}{2} \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa^n_{i,0P}}{\kappa^n_{i,0R}}-1 \right ) \left ( v^n_i \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right ) \right ) + \left ( F_{i+1/2}-F_{i-1/2} \right ) \right

where _{i+1/2}=\frac{3-R_{2,i+1/2}}{8} \left(v_{i}^n+v_{i+1}^n \right ) \left ( E^n_i+E^n_{i+1} \right )

where

_{2,i+1/2} = \lambda_{i+1/2}+\lambda_{i+1/2}^2 R_{i+1/2}^ and _{i+1/2} = \frac{\left | E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i} \right | }{2 \kappa_{0R,i+1/2} \left ( E^n_i+E^n_{i+1} \right )

and lambda_{i+1/2} = \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \left ( \coth R_{i+1/2} - \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \right )

and kappa_{0R,i+1/2} = \frac{\kappa^n_{0R,i}+\kappa^n_{0R,i+1}}{2} \mbox{ and } \lambda_{i+1/2} = \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \left ( \coth R_{i+1/2} - \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \right )

and

lambda_{i} = \frac{1}{R_{i}} \left ( \coth R_{i} - \frac{1}{R_{i}} \right )

and _{i} = \frac{\left | E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right | }{2 \kappa_{0R,i} E^n_{i}

Implicit Update 1

Implicit Update 1

For now we will assume that kappa_{0P and kappa_{0R are constant over the implicit update and we will treat the energy as the total internal energy ignoring kinetic and magnetic contributions. In this case we can solve the radiation energy equations:

frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = \nabla \cdot \frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E + \kappa_{0P} (4 \pi B(T)-cE) = \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} + \kappa_{0P} (4 \pi B(T)-cE frac{\partial e}{\partial t} = - \kappa_{0P} (4 \pi B(T)-cE

where mathbf{F} = \frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla

Expanding about e₀

Of course even if the opacity is independent of energy and radiation energy, the above combined system of equations is still non-linear due to the dependence on Temperature of the Planck Function (T

If we ignore the changes in the Temperature due to heating during the implicit step which would feed back into the source function. We can improve this by writing

(T) = B \left ( T_0+dT \right ) = B \left ( T_0 \right ) + \left . \frac{\partial B}{\partial T} \right | _{T_0} \frac{\partial T}{\partial e} de = \frac{c}{4 \pi} a_R \left ( T_0^4 + 4T_0^3\Gamma de \right ) = B_0 \left ( 1 + 4\Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} \right )

where

Gamma = \frac{\partial T}{\partial e} = \frac{(\gamma-1)}{n k_B

Then the system of equations becomes

frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = \nabla \cdot \frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E + \kappa_{0P} \left [4 \pi B_0 \left ( 1 + 4\Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} \right )-cE \right ] frac{\partial e}{\partial t} = - \kappa_{0P} \left [ 4 \pi B_0 \left ( 1 + 4\Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} \right )-cE \right ]

which will be accurate as long as \Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} < \xi << or Delta e = e-e_0 < \xi \frac{T_0}{4 \Gamma

We can calculate the time scale for this to be true using the evolution equation for the energy density

Delta e = -\Delta t \kappa_{0P} \left [ 4 \pi B_0 -cE \right ] < \xi \frac{T_0}{4 \Gamma

which gives Delta t < \xi \frac{T_0}{4 \Gamma \kappa_{0P} \left ( 4 \pi B_0 - cE \right )

Implicit Discretization 1

Which we can discretize for (1D) as

^{n+1}_i-E^{n}_i = \left [ \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \left ( E^{*}_{i+1}-E^{*}_{i} \right ) - \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \left ( E^{*}_{i}-E^{*}_{i-1} \right ) \right ] - \epsilon^n_i E^{*}_i + \phi^n_i e^{*}_i + \theta^n_i) ^{n+1}_i-e^{n}_i = \epsilon^n_i E^{*}_i - \phi^n_i e^{*}_i - \theta^n_i

where the diffusion coefficient is given by

alpha_{i+1/2}=\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x^2} \frac{c \lambda_{i+1/2}}{\kappa_{0R,i+1/2}} \mbox{ where } \kappa_{0R,i+1/2} = \frac{\kappa^n_{0R,i}+\kappa^n_{0R,i+1}}{2} \mbox{ and } \lambda_{i+1/2} = \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \left ( \coth R_{i+1/2} - \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \right ) and where _{i+1/2} = \frac{\left | E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i} \right | }{2 \kappa_{0R,i+1/2} \left ( E^n_i+E^n_{i+1} \right )

and

epsilon^n_i=c\Delta t \kappa^n_{0P,i

represents the number of absorption/emissions during the time step

and

phi = \epsilon^n_i \frac{4 \pi}{c} B \left ( T^n_i \right ) \left ( \frac{4\Gamma}{T^n_i} \right )

theta = \epsilon^n_i \frac{4 \pi}{c} B \left ( T^n_i \right ) \left ( 1 - 4\Gamma \frac{e^n_i}{T^n_i} \right )

and we can think of the radiative flux as

frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x}\mathbf{F}^n_{i+1/2} = \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \left ( E^{*}_{i+1} - E^{*}_i \right )

Time Discretization

Now all the terms on the right hand side that are linear in E or e have been written as E^* or e^* because there are different ways to approximate E^* (e^*). For Backward Euler we have ^*_i = E^{n+1}_ and for Crank Nicholson we have ^*_i = \frac{1}{2} \left ( E^{n+1}_i + E^n_i \right ) or we can parameterize the solution ^*_i = \psi E^{n+1}_i + \bar{\psi}E^n_ where bar{\psi} = 1-\ps

Backward Euler has psi= and Crank Nicholson has psi=1/

Forward Euler has psi=

In any event in 1D we have the following matrix coefficients

left [ 1 + \psi \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \epsilon^n_i \right ) \right ] E^{n+1}_i - \left ( \psi \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i+1} - \left ( \psi \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i-1} - \left ( \psi \phi^n_i \right ) e^{n+1}_i=\left [ 1 - \bar{\psi} \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \epsilon^n_i \right ) \right ] E^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \right ) E^{n}_{i+1} + \left ( \bar{\psi} \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \right ) E^{n}_{i-1} +\bar{\psi}\phi^n_i e^n_i + \theta^n_ left ( 1 +\psi \phi^n_i \right ) e^{n+1}_i - \left ( \psi \epsilon^n_i \right )E^{n+1}_i =\left ( 1 - \bar{\psi}\phi^n_i \right ) e^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \epsilon^n_i \right ) E^n_i-\theta^i_n

Now since the second equation has no spatial dependence, we can solve it for

color{purple}{e^{n+1}_i = \frac{1}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i}\left \{ \left ( \psi \epsilon^n_i \right )E^{n+1}_i + \left ( 1 - \bar{\psi}\phi^n_i \right ) e^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \epsilon^n_i \right ) E^n_i-\theta^i_n \right \}}

and plug the result into the first equation to get a matrix equation involving only one variable.

color{purple}{\left [ 1 + \psi \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \frac{\epsilon^n_i}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i}\right ) \right ] E^{n+1}_i - \left ( \psi \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i+1} - \left ( \psi \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i-1} =\left [ 1 - \bar{\psi} \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} +\frac{\epsilon^n_i }{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i} \right ) \right ] E^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \right ) E^{n}_{i+1} + \left ( \bar{\psi} \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \right ) E^{n}_{i-1} + \frac{ \phi^n_i}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i} e^n_i+ \frac{1}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i}\theta^i_n

If we ignore the change in the Planck function due to heating during the implicit solve, it is equivalent to setting psi \phi = This gives the following equations:

left [ 1 + \psi \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \epsilon^n_i \right ) \right ] E^{n+1}_i - \left ( \psi \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i+1} - \left ( \psi \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i-1} =\left [ 1 - \bar{\psi} \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \epsilon^n_i \right ) \right ] E^n_i+ \left ( \bar{\psi} \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \right ) E^{n}_{i+1} + \left ( \bar{\psi} \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \right ) E^{n}_{i-1} +\phi^n_i e^n_i + \theta^n_ ^{n+1}_i = e^n_i + \epsilon^n_i \left [ \left ( \psi E^{n+1}_i + \bar{\psi} E^{n}_i \right ) - \frac{4 \pi}{c} B \left ( T^n_i \right ) \right ]

In this case the first equation decouples and can be solved on it's own, and then the solution plugged back into the second equation to solve for the new energy.

2D etc…

For 2D or 3D we have more connections to add to the matrix elements but it is very straight forward… There will be additional alpha terms for each dimension, but everything else stays the same.

Initial solution vector

For the initial solution vector, we can just use Edot from the parent update (or last time step if we are on the coarse grid) to guess E, and then we can solve for the new e given our guess at the new E using the same time stepping (Backward Euler, Crank Nicholson, etc…).

^{n+1}_i = E^{n}_i+\dot{E}^{n}_i \Delta ^{n+1}_i = \frac{1}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \left \{ \left ( \psi \epsilon^n_i \right )E^{n+1}_i + \left ( 1 - \bar{\psi}\phi^n_i \right ) e^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \epsilon^n_i \right ) E^n_i-\theta^i_n \right \}

Coarse-Fine Boundaries

Since we are doing our implicit solves first, we can use time interpolated solutions for the implicit solve for non-refined ghost zones. To do this we just need Edot. The opacities etc… in the ghost zones can be obtained from the hydro terms.

And the radiative implicit heating in coarse ghost cells can be done along with the initial solution vector so they are available for the hydro update.

Physical Boundary Conditions

Open (Free streaming) boundaries

We would like the radiation to leave at the free streaming limit. So frac{c \lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E = \mathbf{F} = cE\mathbf{n} = \frac{c \lambda_g}{\kappa_g}\frac{ \left ( E-E_g \right ) }{\Delta x

Clearly if we set _g = and lambda_g =\kappa_g \Delta we should get the correct flux.

This corresponds to an alpha = c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x

So we would just modify alph and zero out the matrix coefficient to the ghost zone

Constant Slope Boundary

Here we want the flux to be constant so energy does not pile up near the boundary. If we cancel all derivative terms on both sides of the cell, this will effectively match the incoming flux with the outgoing flux. This can also be done by setting alpha_g = \alpha_i =

Periodic Boundary

This is the same as internal zones - it just maps the neighbor cell to be across the domain. Hypre has built in functionality for this under for the Struct Interface

User defined radiation field/Coarse Fine boundary

This will be the boundary at internal coarse-fine boundaries, but could also be used at the physical boundary if the radiation energy were specified.

Reflecting/ZeroSlope Boundary

Reflecting boundary should be fairly straightforward. This an be achieved by setting alpha_g = which zeros out any flux - and has the same effect as setting ^{*}_g=E^{*}_ or ^{n+1}_g=E^{n+1}_i \mbox{ and } E^{n}_g=E^{n}_

Constant radiative flux

To have a constant radiative flux we must zero out terms involving the gradient and just add _0 \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x in the source vector

Summary

Numerical value	Boundary	^{n+1}_{i+1	^{n+1}_	^{n+1}_{i-1
0	RAD_FREE_STREAMING		psi c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	\bar{\psi}c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} E^n_i + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
1	RAD_EXTRAPOLATE_FLUX
2	INTERNAL/PERIODIC	\psi\alpha_{i+1/2	psi\alpha_{i+1/2	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	bar{\psi}\alpha_{i+1/2} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_i \right ) + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
3	RAD_REFLECTING			\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	\bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
4	RAD_USERDEFINED_BOUNDARY/AMR_BOUNDARY		psi\alpha_{i+1/2	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	bar{\psi}\alpha_{i+1/2} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_i \right ) - \psi \alpha_{i+1/2} E^{n+1}_{i+1} + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
5	RAD_USERDEFINED_FLUX			\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	_0 \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right

Alternative Splitting Method

frac{\partial }{\partial t} \left ( \rho \mathbf{v} \right ) + \nabla \cdot \left ( \rho \mathbf{vv} \right ) = -\nabla P\color{green}{-\lambda \nabla E frac{\partial e}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \left [ \left ( e + P \right ) \mathbf{v} \right ] = \color{red}{-\kappa_{0P}(4 \pi B-cE)} \color{orange}{+\lambda \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right ) \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E} \color{blue}{-\frac{3-R_2}{2}\kappa_{0P}\frac{v^2}{c}E frac{\partial E}{\partial t} \color{red}{ - \nabla \cdot \frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E} = \color{red}{\kappa_{0P} (4 \pi B-cE)} \color{orange}{-\lambda \left(2\frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right )\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla E} \color{green}{-\nabla \cdot \left ( \frac{3-R_2}{2}\mathbf{v}E \right )} \color{blue}{+\frac{3-R_2}{2}\kappa_{0P}\frac{v^2}{c}E}

For static diffusion, the terms in blue with v²/c can be dropped and the system can be split into the usual hydro update (black), radiative source terms (green), and a coupled implicit solve (red) for the radiation energy density and thermal energy density (ie temperature). And the terms in orange can be solved semi-implicitly (velocity terms are explicit, while radiation energy terms are implicit)

Operator Splitting 2

Operator splitting 2

Krumholz et al. perform Implicit Radiative, Explicit Hydro, Explicit Radiative

In AstroBEAR this would look like:

• Initialization
  • Prolongate, d, p, e, E, Edot
• Step 1
  • Overlap d, p, e, E and do physical BC's
  • Do IR which updates e₀, and E₀ using d₁, e₁, E₁
  • Update E_2*mbc using Edot_2*mbc
  • Update e_2*mbc using E_2*mbc, Edot_2*mbc, and e_2*mbc
  • Update Edot₀ using pre IR and post IR E₀
  • Ghost e_2*mbc, E_mbc+1, Edot_mbc+1
  • Do first EH_mbc
  • Do ER_mbc —- Terms with grad E can be done without ghosting since EH did not change E. The del dot vE term needs time centered face centered velocities which can be stored during the hydro update.
  • Store Edot in child arrays to be prolongated
• Step 2
  • Overlap d, p, e, E, and do physical BCs
  • Do IR which updates e₀, and E₀ using d₁, e₁, E₁
  • Update Edot₀ using pre IR and post IR E₀
  • Update E₁ using Edot₁
  • Ghost e_mbc, E₁, Edot₁
  • Do second EH₀
  • Do ER₀ —- Terms with grad E can be done without ghosting since EH did not change E. The del dot vE term needs time centered face centered velocities which can be stored during the hydro update.

However with AMR is we need coarse boundary values for E at t=0, and t=dt, and t = 2dt and we would like coarse boundary values at t=2dt to match solution from coarse grid…

But the coarse update involves one implicit and one explicit solve. Is there a way to interpolate the fine grid ghost zones in time without storing two time derivatives? If we store dE_i+dE_e then we could do an explicit radiative update internally (Eⁿ → E*), then an implicit radiative update (E* → Eⁿ⁺¹ using the fully updated ghost zones (Eⁿ⁺¹_g = Eⁿ_g+dE_g) and then store the new time derivative (dE=Eⁿ⁺¹-Eⁿ)

This seems like it would work for the radiative field, but what about the internal energy terms? We have an equation for eⁿ⁺¹ that is a function of Eⁿ⁺¹, e* and E* but we have no way of getting E* in the ghost zones…

So the solution is perhaps to store the contributions from the implicit update and the non-conservative heating terms that appear in the internal energy equation. Then we can update E in the ghost zones for the implicit and the first explicit term using the time derivative - and then use the new E to update e… Then the conservative explicit RadEnergy term can be calculated after the hydro step as well as the momentum explicit term - and then this flux can be coarsened - to keep the value of E in the coarse cells consistent with the value of E in the fine cells… Since both will have been updated by the same eDot and fluxes…

Explcit Update 2

Eplicit Update 2

The extra terms in the explicit update due to radiation energy are as follows:

frac{\partial }{\partial t} \left ( \rho \mathbf{v} \right ) =-\lambda \nabla frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = -\nabla \cdot \left ( \frac{3-R_2}{2}\mathbf{v}E \right )

These can be discretized as follows:

^{n+1}_i=p^n_i - \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} \lambda_{i} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right )

^{n+1}_i=E^n_i + \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} \left ( F_{i+1/2}-F_{i-1/2} \right )

where _{i+1/2}=\frac{3-R_{2,i+1/2}}{8} \left(v_{i}^n+v_{i+1}^n \right ) \left ( E^n_i+E^n_{i+1} \right )

where

_{2,i+1/2} = \lambda_{i+1/2}+\lambda_{i+1/2}^2 R_{i+1/2}^

and _{i+1/2} = \frac{\left | E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i} \right | }{2 \kappa_{0R,i+1/2} \left ( E^n_i+E^n_{i+1} \right )

and lambda_{i+1/2} = \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \left ( \coth R_{i+1/2} - \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \right )

and kappa_{0R,i+1/2} = \frac{\kappa^n_{0R,i}+\kappa^n_{0R,i+1}}{2} \mbox{ and } \lambda_{i+1/2} = \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \left ( \coth R_{i+1/2} - \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \right )

and

lambda_{i} = \frac{1}{R_{i}} \left ( \coth R_{i} - \frac{1}{R_{i}} \right )

and _{i} = \frac{\left | E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right | }{2 \kappa_{0R,i} E^n_{i}

Implicit Update 2

Implicit Update 2

For now we will assume that kappa_{0P and kappa_{0R are constant over the implicit update and we will treat the energy as the total internal energy ignoring kinetic and magnetic contributions. In this case we can solve the radiation energy equations:

frac{\partial e}{\partial t} = -\kappa_{0P}(4 \pi B-cE) + \lambda \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right ) \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = \nabla \cdot \frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E + \kappa_{0P} (4 \pi B(T)-cE) -\lambda \left(2\frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right )\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla E

Expanding about e₀

Of course even if the opacity is independent of energy and radiation energy, the above combined system of equations is still non-linear due to the dependence on Temperature of the Planck Function (T

If we ignore the changes in the Temperature due to heating during the implicit step which would feed back into the source function. We can improve this by writing

(T) = B \left ( T_0+dT \right ) = B \left ( T_0 \right ) + \left . \frac{\partial B}{\partial T} \right | _{T_0} \frac{\partial T}{\partial e} de = \frac{c}{4 \pi} a_R \left ( T_0^4 + 4T_0^3\Gamma de \right ) = B_0 \left ( 1 + 4\Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} \right )

where

Gamma = \frac{\partial T}{\partial e} = \frac{(\gamma-1)}{n k_B

Then the system of equations becomes

frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = \nabla \cdot \frac{c\lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E + \kappa_{0P} \left [4 \pi B_0 \left ( 1 + 4\Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} \right )-cE \right ] - \lambda \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right ) \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E frac{\partial e}{\partial t} = - \kappa_{0P} \left [ 4 \pi B_0 \left ( 1 + 4\Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} \right )-cE \right ] + \lambda \left ( 2 \frac{\kappa_{0P}}{\kappa_{0R}}-1 \right ) \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla E

which will be accurate as long as \Gamma \frac{e-e_0}{T_0} < \xi << or Delta e = e-e_0 < \xi \frac{T_0}{4 \Gamma

We can calculate the time scale for this to be true using the evolution equation for the energy density

Delta e = -\Delta t \kappa_{0P} \left [ 4 \pi B_0 -cE \right ] < \xi \frac{T_0}{4 \Gamma

which gives Delta t < \xi \frac{T_0}{4 \Gamma \kappa_{0P} \left ( 4 \pi B_0 - cE \right )

Implicit Discretization 2

Which we can discretize for (1D) as

^{n+1}_i-E^{n}_i = \left [ \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \left ( E^{*}_{i+1}-E^{*}_{i} \right ) - \alpha^n_{i-1/2} \left ( E^{*}_{i}-E^{*}_{i-1} \right ) \right ] - \epsilon^n_i E^{*}_i + \phi^n_i e^{*}_i + \theta^n_i) - \omega_{i} v_{x,i} \left ( E^{*}_{i+1}-E^*_{i-1} \right ) ^{n+1}_i-e^{n}_i = \epsilon^n_i E^{*}_i - \phi^n_i e^{*}_i - \theta^n_i + \omega_{i} v_{x,i} \left ( E^{*}_{i+1}-E^*_{i-1} \right )

where the diffusion coefficient is given by

alpha_{i+1/2}=\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x^2} \frac{c \lambda_{i+1/2}}{\kappa_{0R,i+1/2}} \mbox{ where } \kappa_{0R,i+1/2} = \frac{\kappa^n_{0R,i}+\kappa^n_{0R,i+1}}{2} \mbox{ and } \lambda_{i+1/2} = \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \left ( \coth R_{i+1/2} - \frac{1}{R_{i+1/2}} \right ) and where _{i+1/2} = \frac{\left | E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i} \right | }{2 \kappa_{0R,i+1/2} \left ( E^n_i+E^n_{i+1} \right )

and

epsilon^n_i=c\Delta t \kappa^n_{0P,i

represents the number of absorption/emissions during the time step

and

phi = \epsilon^n_i \frac{4 \pi}{c} B \left ( T^n_i \right ) \left ( \frac{4\Gamma}{T^n_i} \right )

theta = \epsilon^n_i \frac{4 \pi}{c} B \left ( T^n_i \right ) \left ( 1 - 4\Gamma \frac{e^n_i}{T^n_i} \right )

and

where omega_{i} = \frac{\lambda_i \Delta t}{\Delta x} \left ( \frac{\kappa_{0P,i}}{\kappa_{0R,i}}-\frac{1}{2} \right )

and we can think of the radiative flux as

frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x}\mathbf{F}^n_{i+1/2} = \alpha^n_{i+1/2} \left ( E^{*}_{i+1} - E^{*}_i \right )

Time Discretization

Now all the terms on the right hand side that are linear in E or e have been written as E^* or e^* because there are different ways to approximate E^* (e^*). For Backward Euler we have ^*_i = E^{n+1}_ and for Crank Nicholson we have ^*_i = \frac{1}{2} \left ( E^{n+1}_i + E^n_i \right ) or we can parameterize the solution ^*_i = \psi E^{n+1}_i + \bar{\psi}E^n_ where bar{\psi} = 1-\ps

Backward Euler has psi= and Crank Nicholson has psi=1/

Forward Euler has psi=

In any event in 1D we have the following matrix coefficients

left [ 1 + \psi \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \epsilon^n_i \right ) \right ] E^{n+1}_i - \left ( \psi \left ( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} - \omega_i v_{x,i} \right ) \right ) E^{n+1}_{i+1} - \left ( \psi \left ( \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \omega_i v_{x,i} \right ) \right ) E^{n+1}_{i-1} - \left ( \psi \phi^n_i \right ) e^{n+1}_i=\left [ 1 - \bar{\psi} \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \epsilon^n_i \right ) \right ] E^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \left ( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} - \omega_i v_{x,i} \right ) \right ) E^{n}_{i+1} + \left ( \bar{\psi} \left ( \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \omega_i v_{x,i} \right ) \right ) E^{n}_{i-1} +\bar{\psi}\phi^n_i e^n_i + \theta^n_

left ( 1 +\psi \phi^n_i \right ) e^{n+1}_i - \left ( \psi \epsilon^n_i \right )E^{n+1}_i - \psi \omega_i v_{x,i} E^{n+1}_{i+1} + \psi \omega_i v_{x,i} E^{n+1}_{i-1} =\left ( 1 - \bar{\psi}\phi^n_i \right ) e^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \epsilon^n_i \right ) E^n_i-\theta^i_n + \bar{\psi} \omega_i v_{x,i} \left ( E^{n}_{i+1}- E^{n}_{i-1} \right )

Now since the second equation has no spatial dependence, we can solve it for

color{purple}{e^{n+1}_i = \frac{1}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i}\left \{ \left ( \psi \epsilon^n_i \right )E^{n+1}_i + \left ( \psi \omega_i v_{x,i} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i+1} - \left ( \psi \omega_i v_{x,i} \right ) E^{n+1}_{i-1} + \left ( 1 - \bar{\psi}\phi^n_i \right ) e^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \epsilon^n_i \right ) E^n_i-\theta^i_n + \bar{\psi} \omega_i v_{x,i} \left ( E^{n}_{i+1}- E^{n}_{i-1} \right ) \right \}}

and plug the result into the first equation to get a matrix equation involving only one variable.

color{purple}{\left [ 1 + \psi \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \frac{\epsilon^n_i}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i}\right ) \right ] E^{n+1}_i - \left ( \psi \left ( \alpha^n_{i+1/2}- \frac{\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \right ) \right ) E^{n+1}_{i+1} - \left ( \psi \left ( \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \frac{\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \right ) \right ) E^{n+1}_{i-1} =\left [ 1 - \bar{\psi} \left( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} + \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \frac{\epsilon^n_i }{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i} \right ) \right ] E^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \left ( \alpha^n_{i+1/2} - \frac{\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \right ) \right ) E^{n}_{i+1} + \left ( \bar{\psi} \left ( \alpha^n_{i-1/2} + \frac{\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \right ) \right ) E^{n}_{i-1} + \frac{ \phi^n_i}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i} e^n_i+ \frac{1}{ 1 +\psi \phi^n_i}\theta^i_n

2D etc…

For 2D or 3D we have more connections to add to the matrix elements but it is very straight forward… There will be additional alpha terms for each dimension - and the velocity components (v_x) will change, but everything else stays the same.

Initial solution vector

For the initial solution vector, we can just use Edot from the parent update (or last time step if we are on the coarse grid) to guess E, and then we can solve for the new e given our guess at the new E using the same time stepping (Backward Euler, Crank Nicholson, etc…).

^{n+1}_i = E^{n}_i+\dot{E}^{n}_i \Delta ^{n+1}_i = \frac{1}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \left \{ \left ( \psi \epsilon^n_i \right )E^{n+1}_i + \left ( 1 - \bar{\psi}\phi^n_i \right ) e^n_i + \left ( \bar{\psi} \epsilon^n_i \right ) E^n_i-\theta^i_n \right \}

Coarse-Fine Boundaries

Since we are doing our implicit solves first, we can use time interpolated solutions for the implicit solve for non-refined ghost zones. To do this we just need Edot. The opacities etc… in the ghost zones can be obtained from the hydro terms.

And the radiative implicit heating in coarse ghost cells can be done along with the initial solution vector so they are available for the hydro update.

Physical Boundary Conditions

Open (Free streaming) boundaries

We would like the radiation to leave at the free streaming limit. So frac{c \lambda}{\kappa_{0R}} \nabla E = \mathbf{F} = cE\mathbf{n} = \frac{c \lambda_g}{\kappa_g}\frac{ \left ( E-E_g \right ) }{\Delta x

Clearly if we set _g = and lambda_g =\kappa_g \Delta we should get the correct flux.

This corresponds to an alpha = c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x

So we would just modify alph and zero out the matrix coefficient to the ghost zone

Constant Slope Boundary

Here we want the flux to be constant so energy does not pile up near the boundary. If we cancel all derivative terms on both sides of the cell, this will effectively match the incoming flux with the outgoing flux. This can also be done by setting alpha_g = \alpha_i =

Periodic Boundary

This is the same as internal zones - it just maps the neighbor cell to be across the domain. Hypre has built in functionality for this under for the Struct Interface

User defined radiation field/Coarse Fine boundary

This will be the boundary at internal coarse-fine boundaries, but could also be used at the physical boundary if the radiation energy were specified.

Reflecting/ZeroSlope Boundary

Reflecting boundary should be fairly straightforward. This an be achieved by setting alpha_g = which zeros out any flux - and has the same effect as setting ^{*}_g=E^{*}_ or ^{n+1}_g=E^{n+1}_i \mbox{ and } E^{n}_g=E^{n}_

Constant radiative flux

To have a constant radiative flux we must zero out terms involving the gradient and just add _0 \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x in the source vector

Summary

Numerical value	Boundary	^{n+1}_{i+1	^{n+1}_	^{n+1}_{i-1
0	RAD_FREE_STREAMING		psi c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	\bar{\psi}c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} E^n_i + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
1	RAD_EXTRAPOLATE_FLUX
2	INTERNAL/PERIODIC	\psi\alpha_{i+1/2	psi\alpha_{i+1/2	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	bar{\psi}\alpha_{i+1/2} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_i \right ) + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
3	RAD_REFLECTING			\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	\bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
4	RAD_USERDEFINED_BOUNDARY/AMR_BOUNDARY		psi\alpha_{i+1/2	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	bar{\psi}\alpha_{i+1/2} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_i \right ) - \psi \alpha_{i+1/2} E^{n+1}_{i+1} + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right
5	RAD_USERDEFINED_FLUX			\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	_0 \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} + \bar{\psi}\alpha_{i-1/2} \left ( E^n_{i-1}-E^n_i \right

Numerical value	Boundary	^{n+1}_{i+1	^{n+1}_	^{n+1}_{i-1
0	RAD_FREE_STREAMING		psi c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	\bar{\psi}c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} E^n_
1	RAD_EXTRAPOLATE_FLUX
2	INTERNAL/PERIODIC	\psi\alpha_{i+1/2	psi\alpha_{i+1/2	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	bar{\psi}\alpha_{i+1/2} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_i \right
3	RAD_REFLECTING			\psi\alpha_{i-1/2
4	RAD_USERDEFINED_BOUNDARY/AMR_BOUNDARY		psi\alpha_{i+1/2	\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	bar{\psi}\alpha_{i+1/2} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_i \right ) - \psi \alpha_{i+1/2} E^{n+1}_{i+1}
5	RAD_USERDEFINED_FLUX			\psi\alpha_{i-1/2	_0 \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x

And for the semi implicit term

Numerical value	Boundary	^{n+1}_{i+1	^{n+1}_{i	^{n+1}_{i-1
0	RAD_FREE_STREAMING		\bar{\psi}c \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} E^n_	frac{\psi\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i
1	RAD_EXTRAPOLATE_FLUX*			frac{\psi\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i
2	INTERNAL/PERIODIC	frac{\psi\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i		frac{\psi\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i	\frac{\bar{\psi}\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right
3	RAD_REFLECTING		frac{\psi\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i	\frac{\bar{\psi}\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \left ( E^n_{i}-E^n_{i-1} \right
4	RAD_USERDEFINED_BOUNDARY/AMR_BOUNDARY			frac{\psi\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i	\frac{\bar{\psi}\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} \left ( E^n_{i+1}-E^n_{i-1} \right ) - \frac{\psi\omega_i v_{x,i}}{1+\psi \phi^n_i} E^{n+1}_{i+1
5	RAD_USERDEFINED_FLUX		_0 \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x