| | 71 | |
| | 72 | Matsakos et al, compare the ordering of the Hill radius, the bow radius, and the magnetic radius which give 6 different possible orderings. They lump them into 4 different types. |
| | 73 | |
| | 74 | || I || $\xi_H > \xi_\beta > \xi_{bow}$ || |
| | 75 | || II || $\xi_H > \xi_{bow} > \xi_{beta}$ || |
| | 76 | || III || $\xi_{bow} > \xi_\beta > \xi_H$ || |
| | 77 | || III || $\xi_{bow} > \xi_H > \xi_\beta$ || |
| | 78 | || IV || $\xi_\beta > \xi_{bow} > \xi_H$ || |
| | 79 | || IV || $\xi_\beta > \xi_H > \xi_{bow}$ || |
| | 80 | |
| | 81 | |
| | 82 | |
| | 83 | In general, the planet radius will always be the smallest. You can probably argue that the Hill radius will in general be larger than the Bondi Hoyle radius, since |
| | 84 | |
| | 85 | $\frac{r_{H}}{r_{BH}}=\frac{v_s(a)^2+(a\Omega)^2+c_s^2}{2 G M_p} a\left ( \frac{q}{3} \right ) ^ {1/3} $ |
| | 86 | $ = \frac{v_s(a)^2+G(M_s+M_p)/a+c_s^2}{2 G M_p} a\left ( \frac{q}{3} \right ) ^ {1/3} =\left ( \frac{ \left ( \psi(\frac{1}{\xi_s})+1 \right )}{2\xi_s \lambda_s q}+\frac{1+q}{2q} \right )\left ( \frac{q}{3} \right ) ^ {1/3} $ |
| | 87 | |
| | 88 | Now $\psi \approx< 5$, $q \approx 1/1000$, $\xi_s \approx 1/100$, so in general $r_H >> r_{BH}$ |
| | 89 | |
| | 90 | However, the location of the stellar sonic radius compared to a can be used to constrain the velocity of the stellar wind - and would presumably have more bearing on the dynamics of the bow shock. |
| | 91 | |
| | 92 | |
| | 93 | |
| | 94 | |
| | 95 | The planet radius probably does not matter to much (as long as it is small enough), but if you include the sonic radius and the bondi-hoyle radius, you could have 120 different orderings possible. You could also just focus on the dominant radius (and have 5 types), or the dominant 2 and have 20 sims. In addition you could modify the density contrast at the bow shock to double the number of runs. |
| | 96 | |
| | 97 | |
| | 98 | different |
| | 99 | |
| | 100 | |
| | 101 | |
| | 102 | |
| | 103 | |
| | 104 | |