Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of PlanetaryAtmospheres


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/02/13 14:47:07 (11 years ago)
Author:
Jonathan
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • PlanetaryAtmospheres

    v4 v5  
    33
    44= Planetary Atmospheres =
     5[[Image(Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 9.04.53 AM.png, width=400)]]
     6
     7[[Image(Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 9.06.06 AM.png, width=400)]]
     8
     9[[Image(Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 9.08.08 AM.png​)]]
    510
    611== Description of Problem ==
    712  Hot Jupiters receive much more energy through stellar irradiation then internal heating.  They are also tidally locked due to their proximity.  Dayside at 1000K, night side at 100K without heat redistribution.
    813
    9 What frame to choose?
    10  * Rotating about center of mass of system
    11  * Rotating about axis of secondary
    12  * Non rotating
     14== Profiles ==
     15
     16* Density
     17[[Image(Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 2.33.57 PM.png, width=400)]]
     18* Enclosed Mass
     19[[Image(Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 2.33.42 PM.png, width=400)]]
     20* Pressure - and rho*R*T mismatch
     21[[Image(Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 10.12.16 AM.png​, width=400)]]
    1322
    1423
    15 Dobbs Dixon '08
    16 Domain
    17  * Radius goes from 7.95e9 cm to 8.65e9 cm (1.06 -1.2 R_j)
    18  * Single Temperature (assumes Planck opacity is >> )
    19  * They use [[latex($\lambda = \frac{2+R}{6+3R+R^2}$)]] instead of [[latex($\frac{1}{R}\left ( \coth{R}-\frac{1}{R} \right )$)]]
    20 [[Image(Limiter.png, width=400)]]
    21  * [[latex($\gamma=7/5$)]]
    22  * [[latex($\chi=2.3$)]]
    23  * Roseland opacities found using Pollack et al 1985 for low T with Alexander & Ferguson for high T
    24  * Initial Density and Temperature profiles taken from 1D model (B1 of Bodenheimer 2001) (.63 M,,J,, for 4.5 Gyr with a 1200 degree outer boundary)
    25  * Outer boundary set to T= max(1200 K * [cos(phi)*cos(theta)]^(1/4), 100 K)
     24== Module supports ==
    2625
    27 * Non rotating model - no coriolis or centrifugal forces... - no winds
    28 * Rotating model - 3 days
     26 * Global simulation in a fixed frame
     27 * Global simulation in a rotating frame
     28 * Local simulation in a rotating frame
     29 * Spatial based Refinement of planet
     30 * Stellar envelope in HSE
    2931
    30 
    31 
    32 Dobbs Dixon'10
    33 * Added two temperature model
    34 * Added viscosity
    35 * Added stellar heating using optical depth and high energy planck opacity
    36 
    37 
    38 Current differences between Ian's code and AstroBEAR
    39 * AstroBEAR folds in gas/radiation energy coupling into implicit solve...  Hypre has both kappa,,R,, and kappa,,P,, terms - with sub-cycling for changes in source function.
    40 * AstroBEAR also assumes 'kappa' is constant over implicit update...  assumes [[latex($\frac{\partial \kappa}{\partial T} = 0$)]]... 
    41 * No Kappa_A terms (stellar heating) in AstroBEAR
    42 * Need to develop communication patterns for calculating optical depth from star to get heating term correct.  Could use initial spherical profile to estimate optical depth as a function of position?  Not sure how this is done in Ian's code
    43 * Viscosity may need to be incorporated later...  Shule is developing this.
    44 
    45 * Second AMR implicit solve may need to be added later (ie Howell and Greenough 2002)
    46 
    47 == Initial Params ==
    48 
    49 * Density Profile, Temperature Profile
    50 * Opacity Tables
    51 * Planet held together by self gravity
    52 * Rotating frame about COM
    53 *
     32== Still working on  ==
     33 * Basic testing of hydrostatic equilibrium for planet
     34 * Line transfer for stellar heating
     35 * Second AMR implicit solve may need to be added later (ie Howell and Greenough 2002)