26 | | Thickness option set to 0.1d smoothed density of disk boundary with ambient (r>3.9d0). |
27 | | |
28 | | |
29 | | Not exact 10 M,,j,, accountable from radius not being exactly 2e10cm. |
30 | | |
| 26 | '''Thickness = 0.1d0''' |
| 27 | Thickness option set to 0.1d smoothed density of disk boundary with ambient (r>3.9d0).[[BR]] |
| 28 | [[Image(wiki:hsediskruns:thick1.png, 600px)]][[BR]] |
| 29 | '''Thickness = 0.0d0''' |
| 30 | Obvious increase in mass.[[BR]] |
| 31 | [[Image(wiki:hsediskruns:thick2.png, 600px)]][[BR]] |
| 32 | Not 10 M,,j,, mass accountable from radius not being exactly 2e10cm and height not being 4e9cm.[[BR]] |
| 33 | * Actual radius = 3.984376*lScale=3.984376*5e9=~1.99e10 |
| 34 | * Actual height = 0.781248*lScale=0.781248*5e9=~3.90e9 |
| 35 | * Estimated density for a perfect disk = 3.7754 g/cc |
| 36 | Expected mass given the 3 quantities above: ~9.73M,,j,, which is pretty similar to what we observed.[[BR]] |
| 37 | '''Verdict:''' Mass readings are accurate, should change density to adapt to not exact disk dimensions, decision on thickness. |