Changes between Version 15 and Version 16 of u/BonnorEbertMatched2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/15/12 21:42:15 (12 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/BonnorEbertMatched2

    v15 v16  
    4646'''!Results/Analysis'''
    4747I. Movies
     48
     49'''Stability'''
     50
     51Stability test of the critical BE sphere placed in an ambient rho=0.01rho(Rbe), with sphere and ambient in pressure equilibrium at r=Rbe. This is just the B&P sphere, with no density enhancement, in a box twice as large. My apologies, but the movie is broken into 2, with the first half here: https://clover.pas.rochester.edu/trac/astrobear/attachment/wiki/u/BonnorEbertMatched/rhoCroppedLight.gif and second half here: https://clover.pas.rochester.edu/trac/astrobear/attachment/wiki/u/BEmoviesLonger/rhoSecondHalf.gif. This set-up was stable to collapse for at least 5 crossing times, where 1 tc= 0.2 in computational units, as can be seen from this 2d slice through the center of the sphere. Here the sphere is breathing about its equilibrium initial condition.
     52
     53 [[Image(rhoLight.png, 20%)]]
     54 [[Image(vradLight.png, 20%)]]
     55 [[Image(lineoutStabilityCheck.gif, 20%)]]
     56
    4857'''B&P, classic outside-in collapse'''
    4958
     
    5463 [[Image(BPJuly22.gif, 20%)]]
    5564
    56 
    57 '''Stability'''
    58 
    59 Stability test of the critical BE sphere placed in an ambient rho=0.01rho(Rbe), with sphere and ambient in pressure equilibrium at r=Rbe. This is just the B&P sphere, with no density enhancement, in a box twice as large. My apologies, but the movie is broken into 2, with the first half here: https://clover.pas.rochester.edu/trac/astrobear/attachment/wiki/u/BonnorEbertMatched/rhoCroppedLight.gif and second half here: https://clover.pas.rochester.edu/trac/astrobear/attachment/wiki/u/BEmoviesLonger/rhoSecondHalf.gif. This set-up was stable to collapse for at least 5 crossing times, where 1 tc= 0.2 in computational units, as can be seen from this 2d slice through the center of the sphere. Here the sphere is breathing about its equilibrium initial condition.
    60 
    61  [[Image(rhoLight.png, 20%)]]
    62  [[Image(vradLight.png, 20%)]]
    63  [[Image(lineoutStabilityCheck.gif, 20%)]]
    6465
    6566'''Matched'''
     
    7273
    7374
    74 II. Approximations/Quantitative Estimates?
     75II. !Approximations/Quantitative Estimates?
    7576III. Quantitative calculations on sim. specific quantities?
    7677IV. Figures
     
    8586
    8687
    87  
    88 
    89 
    90 I ran a series of simulations to study the deviation from the 'classic' collapse studies of the BE sphere - a slight increase in density values above equilibrium of a critical sphere (xi=6.5) in pressure equilibrium with its environment (Foster and Chevalier, 1993, Banerjee and Pudritz, 2003). My simulations were all variations of the B&P setup, but with a sphere in a domain twice the size (~30 Rbe), and varying ambient densities. These runs are as follows:
    91 
    92 
    93 
    94 2) 'Classic B&P collapse' of a BE sphere. That is, 10% density enhancement of sphere above equilibrium values, in pressure equilibrium with a light (rho=0.01rho(Rbe) ) ambient. This, as well as the following plots, show lineouts through the center of the sphere of the quantities: rho, absolute value(radial velocity), absolute value(mach), and pressure, all normalized to their initial values in the grid. The x-axis is logarithmic and begins at the length of the smallest zone dx. The y-axis is linear:  http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~erica/BPJuly22.gif . The collapse here resembles the B&P results, namely collapse proceeds in an outside-in fashion and remains subsonic most of the way through.
    95 
    96 
    97 
    98 
    99 
    10088In summary, I would say that the runs in which collapse was NOT induced to occur through a density enhancement, seem to proceed much differently. They resembled qualitatively the runs by Hannebelle et al., in which a pressure wave moved through the sphere, causing collapse into a sink particle. The resolution of these sims became poor by the time the apparent wave has moved into the sphere, so the simulation was killed ostensibly before a sink formed. I can run these simulations out longer and at higher resolution as a next step if you suggest. This however, will be postponed until after I take the preliminary PhD written exam, due to take place at the end of August.