Changes between Version 25 and Version 26 of u/BonnorEbertMatched2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/15/12 22:17:46 (12 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

—

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • u/BonnorEbertMatched2

    v25 v26  
    7979
    8080
    81 Discussion:
    82 -Further directions: non-uniform collapse? Rotation? MHD?
    83 -Hannebelle?
     81'''Discussion'''
     82 I. Further directions: non-uniform collapse? Rotation? MHD?
     83 II. Hannebelle?
    8484
     85'''Plots'''
     86 I. Plot of 4 or so times throughout each simulation with all fluid variables plotted. What would a relevant time scale be to use?
     87 II. M(t) onto shell of r=1.1Rbe, with line drawn for Mbe_crit
     88 III.
    8589
    8690In summary, I would say that the runs in which collapse was NOT induced to occur through a density enhancement, seem to proceed much differently. They resembled qualitatively the runs by Hannebelle et al., in which a pressure wave moved through the sphere, causing collapse into a sink particle. The resolution of these sims became poor by the time the apparent wave has moved into the sphere, so the simulation was killed ostensibly before a sink formed. I can run these simulations out longer and at higher resolution as a next step if you suggest.