Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of u/BonnorEbertMatched2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/15/12 20:55:29 (12 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/BonnorEbertMatched2

    v6 v7  
    1212-Should we run these same set-ups, but with a sub-critical sphere?
    1313
    14 Introduction
     14'''Introduction Outline'''
     15
    1516I. Classic outside-in collapse features vs. SIS
    16         i. Relation to star formation
     17i. Relation to star formation
    1718ii. BE sphere definitions
    1819iii. BE spheres are out there in space, SIS discounted.
     
    2728The collapse of the isothermal, hydrostatic sphere has been studied extensively, albeit with focus mainly on 2 special cases: the self-similarity solutions of the collapsing singular isothermal sphere (Shu), and the more modern numerical studies of collapsing marginally stable spheres (F&C, B&P). However, the latter, and today generally more popular, simple model for protostar formation has been largely limited to the placement of a critical BE sphere in an ambient medium that was a) in pressure equilibrium with the sphere, b) of uniform density many times lighter than that of the sphere’s outermost edge, and c) perturbed out of equilibrium by some artificial trigger such as an overdensity of the sphere and surrounding medium. This led to the present objective of exploring the effect of whether collapse of a marginally stable sphere could be induced by its environment with no ad hoc perturbations, and how that collapse may differ from previous qualitative features.
    2829
    29 Methods
     30'''Methods Outline'''
    3031I. Astrobear/Numerical Setup
    3132        i. 3D-Eulerian grid, with self-gravity, hydro equations?
     
    4344        iv. Maybe a table with the runs and params for each?
    4445
    45 Results/Analysis
     46'''Results/Analysis'''
    4647I. Hmmm.....
    4748II. Approximations/Quantitative Estimates?