Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of u/GasPhiBE


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/04/12 12:59:17 (12 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/GasPhiBE

    v7 v8  
    1818By this method, I found the mass in the light ambient medium to be:
    1919{{{#!latex
    20 M = {0.0007 * {4 \over 3} \pi ({15.4^3 -1 })} = 10.7 * Mscale = 4.77 * 10^36 g = 2,248 Solar Masses ~ \red 14 Mbe
     20M = {0.0007 * {4 \over 3} \pi ({15.4^3 -1 })} = 10.7 * Mscale = 4.77 * 10^36 g = 2,248 Solar Masses
    2121
    2222}}}
    2323
    24 That is, Mamb~14Mbe.
     24That is, '''Mamb~14Mbe'''.
    2525
    26 Since in the matched case, the density becomes 0.07, Mamb=100*Mamb_light~1,400 Mbe. Or, in astronomical units, Mamb_matched=224,800 Solar Mass!
     26Since in the matched case, the density becomes 0.07, '''Mamb=100*Mamb_light~1,400 Mbe'''. Or, in astronomical units, Mamb_matched=224,800 Solar Mass!
    2727
    28282. What is the theoretical potential of the sphere outside of the Rbe?
     
    4242}}}
    4343
     44
     45
    4446=>
    4547
     
    5052
    5153From this we can that when rho is small in ambient, phi is dominated by the first term. That is phi can be approximated as due to the BE sphere as a point gravity source. For non-negligible rho, however, we can expect the r^2^ term to dominate at large r. This would make phi more and more negative.
     54
     55We can arrive at this same equation by taking a slightly different conceptual route. We can consider phi in ambient medium to be due to the superposition of a uniform sphere on top of a point mass object. In pictures, this is like:
     56
     57
     58
     59