Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of u/adebrech/Papers


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/30/16 09:43:14 (9 years ago)
Author:
adebrech
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/adebrech/Papers

    v1 v2  
     1= Wind Launching =
     2
     3[attachment:'Schneiter ea 2016 PhotIon.pdf' Schneiter et al.] calculate effects of radiative transfer and photoionization, but do not launch the wind this way. [attachment:'Murry-Clay ea 2009 AtmoEscHJ.pdf' Murray-Clay et al.] calculate 1D wind from UV flux. [attachment:'Tripathi ea 2015 HJ Blowoff.pdf' Tripathi et al.] calculate multidimensional wind due to heating from UV flux.
     4
    15= [http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.5003v3.pdf Tremblin & Chiang], Computational Charge Exchange =
    26Followup to 2008 and 2010 studies of charge exchange between planetary and stellar winds, which used Monte Carlo simulations of 'meta-particles' that were computationally obstructed by bow shocks. Here they use the hydrodynamic equations (no magnetism, Coriolis and centrifugal forces, or tidal gravity). A slow stellar wind (130 km/s) was chosen to approximate the solar wind, and the isothermal planetary wind was initialized as 80% ionized, following Murray-Clay et al. The planetary wind incorporated photoionization/recombination and advection. To incorporate charge exchange, the hydrodynamic code was augmented with chemical reaction solvers - 4 equations relate x,,i,,, i=1-4 representing each possible combination of hot or cold and neutral or ionized hydrogen, and n,,H,, with beta, the reaction rate. These equations take reverse exchange into account, so as not to overestimate neutral hydrogen too greatly (still slightly overestimated). x,,i,, is also included in the hydrodynamic equations. The simulations appear to reproduce the observed absorption curves well, with asymmetry between the two sides of the Doppler shift.