Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of u/adebrech/todo

Timestamp:

12/01/16 11:07:23 (8 years ago)

Author:

adebrech

Comment:

—

u/adebrech/todo

@@ -16 +16 @@
 JC - Another option is to increase the transition radius for the magnetic field from r_p/2 to closer to r_p.  This will take a little calculus to make sure it is done correctly... see https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/johannjc06302015 for the equations currently implemented in the problem module.  In terms of increasing the resolution - you may be able to just add additional levels of AMR - would need to see plots of the mesh (sliced through the midplane) with density overlayed to see how it is currently refined.
 
+I believe just increasing the resolution should be ok - higher resolution is forced out to about 4R,,p,,, and it doesn't seem to want to resolve a ton outside of that, so shouldn't increase computational time more than necessary. Here's a slice near the midplane:
+
+[[Image(visit0101.png)]]
 
 
+