Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of u/adebrech/todo


Ignore:
Timestamp:
12/01/16 11:08:29 (8 years ago)
Author:
adebrech
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/adebrech/todo

    v3 v4  
    1616JC - Another option is to increase the transition radius for the magnetic field from r_p/2 to closer to r_p.  This will take a little calculus to make sure it is done correctly... see https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/johannjc06302015 for the equations currently implemented in the problem module.  In terms of increasing the resolution - you may be able to just add additional levels of AMR - would need to see plots of the mesh (sliced through the midplane) with density overlayed to see how it is currently refined.
    1717
    18 I believe just increasing the resolution should be ok - higher resolution is forced out to about 4R,,p,,, and it doesn't seem to want to resolve a ton outside of that, so shouldn't increase computational time more than necessary. Here's a slice near the midplane:
     18I believe just increasing the resolution should be ok - higher resolution is forced out to about 4R,,p,,, and it doesn't seem to want to resolve a ton outside of that, so shouldn't increase computational time more than necessary. Here's a slice near the midplane, zoomed in a bit:
    1919
    2020[[Image(visit0101.png)]]
    21 
    22 
    23