Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of u/adebrech/todo
- Timestamp:
- 12/01/16 11:08:29 (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
u/adebrech/todo
v3 v4 16 16 JC - Another option is to increase the transition radius for the magnetic field from r_p/2 to closer to r_p. This will take a little calculus to make sure it is done correctly... see https://astrobear.pas.rochester.edu/trac/blog/johannjc06302015 for the equations currently implemented in the problem module. In terms of increasing the resolution - you may be able to just add additional levels of AMR - would need to see plots of the mesh (sliced through the midplane) with density overlayed to see how it is currently refined. 17 17 18 I believe just increasing the resolution should be ok - higher resolution is forced out to about 4R,,p,,, and it doesn't seem to want to resolve a ton outside of that, so shouldn't increase computational time more than necessary. Here's a slice near the midplane :18 I believe just increasing the resolution should be ok - higher resolution is forced out to about 4R,,p,,, and it doesn't seem to want to resolve a ton outside of that, so shouldn't increase computational time more than necessary. Here's a slice near the midplane, zoomed in a bit: 19 19 20 20 [[Image(visit0101.png)]] 21 22 23