Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of u/adebrech


Ignore:
Timestamp:
02/15/16 09:24:58 (9 years ago)
Author:
adebrech
Comment:

—

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • u/adebrech

    v1 v2  
    22[[PageOutline]]
    33
    4 = Insert content here =
     4= Experimenting with AstroBEAR =
    55Ran OutflowWind simulations with varying parameters. Thickness and wind velocity don't appear to have any effect - perhaps an effect of rescaling? Velocity speeds up the simulation as a whole. The rest are as follows:
    66
    77Reference (default parameters, 100 frames, 2 units computational time (conversion?)):
    88
    9 [[Image(reference.gif)]]
     9[[Image(reference.gif),width=300]]
    1010
    1111Radius increases size of wind, but otherwise has little effect, at least at small values (expected).
    1212
    13 Radius of 2: [[Image(rad=2.gif)]]
     13Radius of 2: [[Image(rad=2.gif),width=300]]
    1414
    1515Increasing density appears to decrease relative density at the center of the front of the outflow (slightly counter-intuitive, but makes sense).
    1616
    17 Density of 5: [[Image(rho=5.gif)]]   Density of 10: [[Image(rho=10.gif)]]   Density of 20: [[Image(rho=20.gif)]]
     17Density of 5: [[Image(rho=5.gif),width=300]]   Density of 10: [[Image(rho=10.gif),width=300]]   Density of 20: [[Image(rho=20.gif),width=300]]
    1818
    1919Increasing temp. creates a more diffuse cloud at the end (predictably). Temp = 0 appears to cause buggy behavior.
    2020
    21 Temp = 0: [[Image(temp=0.gif)]]   Temp = 1: [[Image(temp=1.gif)]]     Temp = 5: [[Image(temp=5.gif)]]
     21Temp = 0: [[Image(temp=0.gif,width=300)]]   Temp = 1: [[Image(temp=1.gif,width=300)]]     Temp = 5: [[Image(temp=5.gif,width=300)]]
    2222
    2323Also tried a run at 1000 frames, but definitely overkill for time.