Changes between Version 26 and Version 27 of u/erica/AccretionModelingBlog


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/20/18 22:14:32 (7 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/erica/AccretionModelingBlog

    v26 v27  
    1616With respect to these 'Bondi' variables, the sims used the following (in computational units), unless otherwise noted:
    1717
    18 || $C_{\infty}$ ||  1.291 ||
    1918|| $T_{\infty}$ || ~1 ||
    2019|| $\rho_{\infty}$ || ~1 ||
    2120|| $M_*$ || .14318E+13 ||
    22 || $R_{BH}$ || 25.63 ||
    23 || $\dot{M}_{BH}$ || 2692.17  ||
    2421
    2522with the computational domain set up using:
     
    3734=== 3/18/18, $\gamma=7/5$, dynamical cases ===
    3835
     36|| $\gamma$ || 1.4 ||
     37|| $\lambda_{crit}$ || .625 ||
     38|| $C_{\infty}$ ||  1.183 ||
     39|| $R_{BH}$ || 30.5 ||
     40|| $R_{s}$ || .6101 ||
     41|| $\dot{M}_{BH}$ || 8646.9  ||
     42
    3943==== Resolving sonic point ====
     44
     45
    4046
    4147==== Not-resolving sonic point ====
     
    5157|| $\gamma$ || 1.66 ||
    5258|| $\lambda_{crit}$ || .2526 ||
     59|| $C_{\infty}$ ||  1.291 ||
     60|| $R_{BH}$ || 25.63 ||
    5361|| $R_{s}$ || .0128 ||
     62|| $\dot{M}_{BH}$ || 2692.17  ||
    5463
    5564Note, the sonic radius is not resolved by ~ factor of 20 in this simulation, as seen when checking dx quoted above.