Changes between Version 26 and Version 27 of u/erica/AccretionModelingBlog
- Timestamp:
- 03/20/18 22:14:32 (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
u/erica/AccretionModelingBlog
v26 v27 16 16 With respect to these 'Bondi' variables, the sims used the following (in computational units), unless otherwise noted: 17 17 18 || $C_{\infty}$ || 1.291 ||19 18 || $T_{\infty}$ || ~1 || 20 19 || $\rho_{\infty}$ || ~1 || 21 20 || $M_*$ || .14318E+13 || 22 || $R_{BH}$ || 25.63 ||23 || $\dot{M}_{BH}$ || 2692.17 ||24 21 25 22 with the computational domain set up using: … … 37 34 === 3/18/18, $\gamma=7/5$, dynamical cases === 38 35 36 || $\gamma$ || 1.4 || 37 || $\lambda_{crit}$ || .625 || 38 || $C_{\infty}$ || 1.183 || 39 || $R_{BH}$ || 30.5 || 40 || $R_{s}$ || .6101 || 41 || $\dot{M}_{BH}$ || 8646.9 || 42 39 43 ==== Resolving sonic point ==== 44 45 40 46 41 47 ==== Not-resolving sonic point ==== … … 51 57 || $\gamma$ || 1.66 || 52 58 || $\lambda_{crit}$ || .2526 || 59 || $C_{\infty}$ || 1.291 || 60 || $R_{BH}$ || 25.63 || 53 61 || $R_{s}$ || .0128 || 62 || $\dot{M}_{BH}$ || 2692.17 || 54 63 55 64 Note, the sonic radius is not resolved by ~ factor of 20 in this simulation, as seen when checking dx quoted above.