Changes between Version 36 and Version 37 of u/erica/AccretionModelingBlog


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/25/18 22:56:48 (7 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/erica/AccretionModelingBlog

    v36 v37  
    5959[[Image(Bondi_Comparison_gamma1pt4.png, 35%)]]
    6060
    61 Note -- I did this lineout from the center of the first zone in the octant surrounding the sink, to the zone center at the edge of the boundary. Aside from doing a spherical average over shells, I think this will provide the most accurate results from Visit (rather than along cell boundaries, which I am not sure how Visit interpolates..)
     61(Note -- I did this lineout from the center of the first zone in the octant surrounding the sink, to the zone center at the edge of the boundary. Aside from doing a spherical average over shells, I think this will provide the most accurate results from Visit, as I was getting somewhat wonky results sampling along cell boundaries -- probably due to Visit's interpolatation method)
    6262
    6363Calculating the mass flux through spherical shells surrounding the sink seems to agree well with the predicted value of $\dot{M}_{BH}=8646.9$. I tried at 3 different radii: $r=5<R_s$, $r=8>R_s$, $r=25>OBS$, where $OBS$ is the spherical boundary in the grid beyond which the Bondi solution is pasted into cells: