Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of u/erica/BEMar1


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/01/13 15:53:38 (12 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/erica/BEMar1

    v9 v10  
    33From the BP collapse (quarter of the grid):
    44
    5 On the left side is a plot of a zoomed in section of the BE sphere, including the frames right after and including sink formation. You can see the density compression wave converging on the center. In the right panel are the sinks. At first one forms, then a next, and a next, to a multitude. This is not what we'd expect. What we should expect is exact symmetry: at the center of the collapsing sphere a sink should form, stay stationary, and accrete the surrounding envelope. My assumption is that this is not happening because of an even number of cells forcing the sink to form off center of the potential (due to AMR and the quadrant of the BE sphere), exacerbating asymmetry in the mesh and subsequent evolution.
     5On the left side is a plot of a zoomed in section of the BE sphere (sink formation is at frame = 96). You can see the density compression wave converging on the center. In the right panel are the sinks. At first one forms, then a next, and a next, to a multitude. This is not what we'd expect. What we should expect is exact symmetry: at the center of the collapsing sphere a sink should form, stay stationary, and accrete the surrounding envelope. My assumption is that this is not happening because of an even number of cells forcing the sink to form off center of the potential (due to AMR and the quadrant of the BE sphere), exacerbating asymmetry in the mesh and subsequent evolution.
    66
    77[[Image(feb27b.gif, 35%)]][[Image(feb27c.gif, 35%)]]
     
    1010
    1111Here is early (pre sink) zoomed out evolution:
     12
    1213[[Image(feb27aMat.gif, 35%)]]
    1314
    1415Here is late zoomed in (sink and post sink formation):
     16
    1517[[Image(feb27bMat.gif, 35%)]][[Image(feb27cMat.gif, 35%)]]
    1618