Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of u/erica/JeansInstability


Ignore:
Timestamp:
06/21/13 11:37:52 (11 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/erica/JeansInstability

    v6 v7  
    6060
    6161
    62 What we'd like to do now is determine, for which frequencies is the perturbation ''unstable'' (exponentially growing), and for what frequencies is the perturbation ''stable'' (exponentially decaying). In order to determine this we can rewrite [[latex($\omega$)]] into a more intuitive form.
     62What we'd like to do now is determine, for which frequencies is the perturbation ''unstable'' (exponentially growing). In order to determine this we can rewrite [[latex($\omega$)]] into a more intuitive form.
    6363
     64[[latex($\omega ^2 = -(4 \pi G \rho_0 - C_s^2 k^2) \Rightarrow$)]]
     65
     66[[latex($\omega = ^+_- [-4 \pi G \rho_0(1-\frac{C_s^2 k^2}{4 \pi G \rho_0})]^{1/2} \Rightarrow$)]]
     67
     68[[latex($\omega = ^+ _- i[4 \pi G \rho_0 (1 - \frac{C_s^2 k^2}{4 \pi G \rho_0})]^{1/2} \Rightarrow$)]]
     69
     70[[latex($\omega = ^+ _- i[4 \pi G \rho_0 (1 - \frac{\lambda_J ^2}{\lambda^2})]^{1/2}$)]]
     71
     72Taking the positive root and plugging into [[latex($\rho_1$)]], we see
     73
     74[[latex($\rho_1 =$)]]
    6475
    6576