Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of u/erica/MusclHancock


Ignore:
Timestamp:
06/17/13 13:53:02 (11 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/erica/MusclHancock

    v9 v10  
    99[[Image(compare2.png, 35%)]]
    1010
    11 The higher order schemes as you can see here are 'dispersive'. That is, they suffer from slight sign errors in the position of the wave, with the numerical solution either lagging behind or  ahead of the true solution.
     11The higher order schemes, as you can see here, are 'dispersive'. That is, they suffer from slight sign errors in the position of the wave, with the numerical solution either lagging behind or  ahead of the true solution.
    1212
    1313The above plots show that 2nd order schemes largely perform better than 1st order schemes in regions of 'smooth flow'. However, it is well known that these same higher order accurate schemes can produce spurious oscillations near large gradients. This is due to the higher order schemes no longer being monotone (i.e. having strictly non-negative coefficients in their conservation update formula). Here is a plot showing the same 4 schemes listed above, but for a step function initial condition: