Changes between Version 20 and Version 21 of u/erica/MusclHancock


Ignore:
Timestamp:
06/17/13 14:26:23 (11 years ago)
Author:
Erica Kaminski
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • u/erica/MusclHancock

    v20 v21  
    3030[[latex($ u_i^ {n+1} = u_i ^n + \frac{\triangle t}{\triangle x}[f_{i-1/2} - f_{i+1/2}]$)]]
    3131
    32 for each element of u. When f is the numerical flux. For the 1st order Godunov scheme studied previously, f was taken to simply be the physical flux of 2 adjacent cells, evaluated using the solution to the Local Riemann Problem at the intercell boundary. We have seen various approximation methods to this Godonov scheme, some which estimate the solutipn of the Riemann problem itself along these intercell boundaries, and others that approximate the numerical flux at these boundaries. Next, we will see how the MH scheme produces a 2nd-order accurate solution to the problem. The MH scheme proceeds as follows, being broken down into 3 distinct steps.
     32for each element of u, where f is the numerical flux. For the 1st order Godunov scheme studied previously, f was taken to simply be the physical flux of 2 adjacent cells, evaluated using the solution to the Local Riemann Problem at the intercell boundary. We have seen various approximation methods to this Godonov scheme, some which estimate the solutipn of the Riemann problem itself along these intercell boundaries, and others that approximate the numerical flux at these boundaries. Next, we will see how the MH scheme produces a 2nd-order accurate solution to the problem. The MH scheme proceeds as follows, being broken down into 3 distinct steps.
    3333
    34341.