Changes between Version 102 and Version 103 of u/erica/RoeSolver

Timestamp:

05/31/13 14:53:10 (11 years ago)

Author:

Erica Kaminski

Comment:

—

u/erica/RoeSolver

@@ -159 +159 @@
 [[Image(Roe3.png, 100%)]]
 
-and corresponding files, modules, etc., are here: [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~erica/solver.f90 Exact Riemann Solver -module], [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~erica/God_Roe.f90 Roe Solver - main program], http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~erica/GodRoeproblem.data problem.data file]. To compile, simply type '''''gfortran solver.f90 God_Roe.f90 -o program'''''.
+and corresponding files, modules, etc., are here: [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~erica/solver.f90 Exact Riemann Solver, module], [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~erica/God_Roe.f90 Roe Solver, main program], [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~erica/GodRoeproblem.data problem.data file]. To compile, simply type ''gfortran solver.f90 God_Roe.f90 -o program''.
 
 
@@ -174 +174 @@
 == Test 2 == 
 
-The Roe solver fails with low density flows such as that generated in this test. This is the major short coming of the Roe Solver, that is not present for the other approximation methods we have studied such as PVRS models.
+The Roe solver fails with low density flows such as that generated in this test. This is the major short coming of the Roe Solver that is not present for the other approximation methods we have studied such as PVRS models.
 
 == Test 3 ==